06-13-2017, 08:24 AM
TAP 0.5.1 had an option to use real data. How about reintegrating this?
Maybe you're right, not everything should be predefined.
what about this: (if real data option is selected)
60% predefined routes/40% random routes (although smarter selection which routes it's gonna fly)
If there are no profitable predefined routes left, it should just add random routes.
However, I still don't like to see holiday airlines (like thomas cook) doing domestic routes or i.e. London - Brussels.
Neither should British airways open it's first route away from it's homebase or on another continent, that's something for if many routes from the homebase/focus airports already have been established.
ofcourse, if the real data option is selected, airlines ignore the 60/40 division.
(still, holiday airlines should fly on holiday destinations, airlines should fly routes from their focus airports before expanding to other airports)
note: the 60/40 division is a random chosen number. it could be 70/30 or whatever...
Maybe you're right, not everything should be predefined.
what about this: (if real data option is selected)
60% predefined routes/40% random routes (although smarter selection which routes it's gonna fly)
If there are no profitable predefined routes left, it should just add random routes.
However, I still don't like to see holiday airlines (like thomas cook) doing domestic routes or i.e. London - Brussels.
Neither should British airways open it's first route away from it's homebase or on another continent, that's something for if many routes from the homebase/focus airports already have been established.
ofcourse, if the real data option is selected, airlines ignore the 60/40 division.
(still, holiday airlines should fly on holiday destinations, airlines should fly routes from their focus airports before expanding to other airports)
note: the 60/40 division is a random chosen number. it could be 70/30 or whatever...