Posts: 84
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
1
09-18-2017, 10:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-24-2017, 12:19 PM by 257istderboss.)
<airport name="Cuxhaven-Nordholz Sea Airport" icao="ETMN" iata="FCN" type="International" season="All_Year">
<town town="Cuxhaven" country="1002" GMT="02:00:00" DST="01:00:00" />
<coordinates>
<latitude value="53°46'2''N" />
<longitude value="8°39'31''O" />
</coordinates>
<size value="Very_small" pax="20" cargo="Small" cargovolume="100" />
<terminals>
<terminal name="Terminal" gates="2" />
</terminals>
<runways>
<runway name="08/26" length="2439" surface="Asphalt" />
</runways>
</airport>
Nordholz isn't a big airport, but Germania will operate a weekly flight to PMI which starts on 29.09. and ends on 10.11.. Also, OFD operates flights from Nordholz daily to Helgoland and some freight flights arrive monthly.
Posts: 2,539
Threads: 102
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
23
Language: EN, NL, FR, DE
Location: Belgium
Is this a new in game airport or did you update an existing one?
I'll take it into account in the historic airports project.
Posts: 84
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
1
(09-18-2017, 11:00 AM)Tjoeker Wrote: Is this a new in game airport or did you update an existing one?
I'll take it into account in the historic airports project.
It's a new one, but not historic
Posts: 2,539
Threads: 102
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
23
Language: EN, NL, FR, DE
Location: Belgium
well, maybe I should find a new name for the project :p
I mean that project where we change the demand for the airports to more accurate numbers in older eras.
Posts: 45
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation:
1
Are u serious to put in "pax=160" for an airport, that will have its first flights from Sept 2017 and only seasonal charter flights??? I think, around 25-35 as MAXIMUM will be WAY more realistic for the beginning. No one knows, if this airport will be accepted from pax, it should be better to keep an eye on the development instead of syaing "wil be 160.000 pax per year"!!
So u can put in "Schwerin-Parchim International Airport (IATA:SZW, ICAO:EDOP)" aswell. 1,5 K pax per year (in 2010) and only, because they have made an offer to take-over Air Berlin and because they want to install AB at SZW then...
Posts: 2,539
Threads: 102
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
23
Language: EN, NL, FR, DE
Location: Belgium
I'll add it to my list, thanks
I'll will recheck all data anyways, don't worry.
Posts: 84
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation:
1
(09-22-2017, 06:15 PM)Therealnick Wrote: Are u serious to put in "pax=160" for an airport, that will have its first flights from Sept 2017 and only seasonal charter flights??? I think, around 25-35 as MAXIMUM will be WAY more realistic for the beginning. No one knows, if this airport will be accepted from pax, it should be better to keep an eye on the development instead of syaing "wil be 160.000 pax per year"!!
So u can put in "Schwerin-Parchim International Airport (IATA:SZW, ICAO:EDOP)" aswell. 1,5 K pax per year (in 2010) and only, because they have made an offer to take-over Air Berlin and because they want to install AB at SZW then... Edited, misunderstood there something
Posts: 45
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation:
1
09-23-2017, 09:01 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-23-2017, 09:02 PM by Therealnick.)
NOt Parchim-Airport made a buy-offer for AB, the Chineses owners did. Sorry, was not clear when I posted it. And Parchim is only a small airport, where are a few cargo flights to China weekly.
Please wait adding this airport until the AB-sell-off is over. If the Chinese will not win, Parchim is not really needed in the game.
@257:
20K passt eher ;-)
Posts: 2,539
Threads: 102
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation:
23
Language: EN, NL, FR, DE
Location: Belgium
Ok, thanks for the info.
Is there some kind of airport/airline news site for this info?
I'd like to keep an eye on it without to much effort.
Anyway, I'll always need this kind of user input because there are to many airports in the world to keep track of them all.
Posts: 45
Threads: 2
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation:
1
|